US Personal Income Apr: -13.1% (est -14.2%; prevR 20.9%; prev 21.1%); US Personal Spending Apr: 0.5% (est 0.5%; prevR 4.7%; prev 4.2%) - details and analysis

 

  • US Personal Income Apr: -13.1% (est -14.2%; prevR 20.9%; prev 21.1%)
  • US Personal Spending Apr: 0.5% (est 0.5%; prevR 4.7%; prev 4.2%)
  • US Real Personal Spending Apr: -0.1% (est 0.2%; prevR 4.1%; prev 3.6%)
  • US PCE Deflator (M/M) Apr: 0.6% (est 0.6%; prevR 0.6%; prev 0.5%)
  • US PCE Deflator (Y/Y) Apr: 3.6% (est 3.5%; prevR 2.4%; prev 2.3%)
  • US PCE Core Deflator (M/M) Apr: 0.7% (est 0.6%; prev 0.4%)
  • US PCE Core Deflator (Y/Y) Apr: 3.1% (est 2.9%; prevR 1.9%; prev 1.8%)

As anticipated, April personal income comes in with a big decline off of March's stimulus infused massive increase, but remains far above pre-pandemic levels. Spending held in with a nominal increase but inflation adjusted it fell a touch m/m. I'll go through each piece independently, but overall a positive report. Tables at the end.

Personal Income



With government transfer payments falling 41% some giveback was inevitable.  But looking past that, compensation was up again this month by 0.9% (with wages and salaries up 1%) and proprietor's income built off of last month's very solid 6.2% increase with a gain of 3.1%.  So the underlying economy continues to perform well.  That's back to back solid improvement for wages, something the Fed has to be eyeing cautiously.

From the report:
The decrease in personal income in April primarily reflected a decrease in government social benefits. Within government social benefits, "other" social benefits decreased as economic impact payments made to individuals from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 continued, but at a lower level than in March. Unemployment insurance also decreased, led by decreases in payments from the Pandemic Unemployment Compensation program.

Consumer Spending




As noted, on a nominal basis spending improved over February's huge gains (which were revised up a bit due to a big revision up in durables purchases) but on a real basis (i.e., inflation adjusted) they pulled back a touch.  In nominal terms, spending on goods pulled back by 0.6% after being up 9.7% in March with durables up a half percent (was up 14.5% in March) and non-durables falling 1.3% (was up 6.9%).  Services purchases were up 1.1% after gaining 2.1% in March. 

From the report:
The $80.3 billion increase in current dollar PCE in April reflected an increase of $112.6 billion in spending for services that was partly offset by a $32.3 billion decrease in spending for goods. Within services, the largest contributors to the increase were spending for recreation services and for food services and accommodations. Within goods, a decrease in nondurable goods was partly offset by an increase in durable goods. Within nondurable goods, the decrease was widespread and led by food and beverages. Within durable goods, the increase was accounted for by an increase in motor vehicles and parts.
Personal Savings

Savings rate which had soared to 27.6% in March pulled back to 14.9% in April but this remains well above pre-pandemic levels.  I don't have a handy chart, but this is last month's to give you an idea.



Prices

On prices, goods were up 0.7% (same as March) with durables up 1.4% (was 0.6%) and non-durables up three tenths (was eight tenths) m/m. Services were up half percent (same as March which was revised down from eighth tenths).  Food was up three tenths and energy fell 0.2% after being up 4.9% in March) m/m.  This is the Fed's preferred method for measuring inflation.


Here's a longer term chart.




Table of m/m income and spending:



Prices






To see more content, including my morning and evening summaries and summaries of some of today's economic reports go to https://sethiassociates.blogspot.com





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Neil's Morning Update - 12/27/21

Image
Neil's Morning Update - 12/27/21 Please excuse typos.  Mornings are tilted more international, evenings more U.S.  Continuing to try to make this more digestible for those who are not as familiar with the markets, lingo, etc.  Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments section, they are appreciated.  Also, I don't discuss crypto extensively as I don't consider myself knowledgeable enough to talk intelligently on the subject (and there are plenty of other sources for that). As are reminder, this is a free blog I put out to try to help people get information, so no editors, etc. A small glossary.   SPX = S&P 500 Naz = Nasdaq Composite NDX = Nasdaq 100 (100 largest stocks in the Naz) RUT = Russell 2000 (smaller stocks) DMA = Daily Moving Average (the moving average over the given time period (20, 50, 100, 200 days normally)). MACD = Moving Average Convergence Divergence (basically a trend indicator) RSI = 14-day Relative Strength Index (basically what it sounds like)
Read more

US New Homes Sales Nov: 744K (est 770K; prev 745K; prevR 662K) - New home sales come in under expectations due to huge October revisions

Image
US New Homes Sales Nov: 744K (est 770K; prev 745K; prevR 662K)  - US New Home Sales (M/M) Nov: 12.4% (est 3.4%; prev 0.4%; prevR –8.4%) Microsoft Word - newressales_auto_text.docx (census.gov) As always big h/t to Bill McBride (@calculatedrisk) for the charts and helpful analysis.  He's a go to follow on Twitter for all things housing.   After October numbers were revised down significantly (by over -10%), November new home sales got back to where October was originally reported, they came in well above expectations in terms of m/m growth but well under in terms of number of houses sold.  Specifically, October was revised down from 745k homes sold on a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) to 662k and November came in at 744k (estimates were for 770k)  As we're lapping the start of the pandemic boom, y/y down significantly (-14.0%).  But we continue to remain well above 2019 levels.   Median prices, which had increased to record high levels in October moved higher to $416.9k.
Read more

Dallas Fed Manufacturing Survey: +9 vs. +25 consensus and +27.3 prior - Dallas Fed Mfg comes in well below expectations as supply chains and prices constrain new orders and shipments

Image
Dallas Fed Manufacturing Survey: +9 vs. +25 consensus and +27.3 prior. August Dallas Fed manufacturing survey (for Texas region) comes in similar to other Fed surveys other than Richmond, well under expectations and the July read, but still firmly in positive territory.  In the case of Texas, new orders and shipments drove most of the decline with those indicators falling by double digits (although still coming in well above survey historical averages).  Based on the comments and the fact that backlogs edged up, it sounds like despite orders falling there is more than enough business.  It is servicing that business that is the issue.  In that regard prices and wages remained very high.  But the capacity constraints and high prices did result in outlooks falling by double digits both for current conditions and six months out.  They did remain as did the other indicators firmly in positive territory.  Full table at the end.  Here was the commentary from the report: Texas factory activity
Read more